By Barry Rascovar
Oct. 8, 2014 — This is the best we’ve got?
It was a painfully thin performance by both Democrat Anthony Brown and Republican Larry Hogan Jr. in Maryland’s first gubernatorial debate of the month Tuesday night.
They followed their handlers’ terribly misguided advice to trash one another. They went out of their way to go negative and too often repeated their trite attack lines and glaringly erroneous accusations.
The result: Neither candidate presented a compelling argument for becoming governor.
“Vote for Me”
Instead, they all but proclaimed to voters: “If you don’t like what the other guy stands, then vote for me.” What a horrible way to waste an hour of valuable debate time on statewide TV.
Brown clearly bested Hogan on the environmental question of the night.
He gave a detailed and cogent explanation of efforts to protect and clean up the Chesapeake Bay.
Hogan’s response — delaying bay cleanup efforts while he sues Pennsylvania and New York to force upstream sediment removal in the Susquehanna River — was an evasive and weak answer to the question.
Hogan had by far the better response on crime.
He zeroed in on Maryland’s heroin epidemic, summarized the crisis and called for a summit to find answers.
Brown rattled off past successes against crime, which rang hollow given the state’s continuing struggle to stem the violence.
The saddest part of the evening may have been each candidate’s exaggerations to the point of fabrication.
Each used budget-saving ideas and fiscal numbers based mainly on hot air.
As for the biggest mistake of the evening, that belongs to Anthony Brown’s. “There will be no new taxes under the Brown-Ulman administration,” he said.
Brown will rue the day he made that campaign promise.
There’s no way he can govern eight years without increasing the state’s revenue base.
It was another of what Hogan correctly called Brown’s “phony promises” that ignore Maryland’s $405 million deficit, recent dips in revenue collections and the state’s ballooning expenses over the next four or five years.
Moving the Economy
Both candidates overpromised when it came to reviving Maryland’s economy.
No governor has the ability to do that, though a governor can nudge things in the right direction long-term with wise tax reforms.
Brown’s closing remarks were pathetically weak (the “American dream” shtick). Hogan’s closing was far superior in making the case for change.
Still, the bottom line is that Brown didn’t mess up in Debate No. 1.
As the Democratic candidate, he’s got a built-in advantage in deeply blue Maryland.
The race remains his to lose.
# # #
Barry Rascovar has been reporting on Maryland politics for over 40 years. His columns can be found at www.politicalmaryland.com.